As the demand for healthier and low-carbohydrate alternatives to sugar continues to rise, natural sweeteners have become a popular choice in commercial food production. However, each sweetener comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we'll explore some of the most commonly used natural sweeteners, including xylitol, stevia, erythritol, monk fruit extract, and sugar alcohols, and discuss their pros and cons.
Xylitol
Xylitol is a sugar alcohol that is derived from birch bark or corn cobs. It is about as sweet as sugar, but has fewer calories and a lower glycemic index, making it a suitable sugar substitute for diabetics and those watching their weight. It also has a cooling effect when consumed, which can be pleasant for some people.
Advantages:
- Has a similar sweetness to sugar
- Fewer calories than sugar
- Suitable for diabetics and those watching their weight
- Helps prevent tooth decay
- Creates a cooling effect when consumed
Disadvantages:
- Can cause digestive discomfort, bloating, or diarrhea when consumed in large quantities
- Can be toxic to dogs
Stevia
Stevia is a natural sweetener that is derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant. It has zero calories and a glycemic index of zero, making it a popular choice for those on low-carbohydrate or ketogenic diets. It is also up to 200 times sweeter than sugar, so only a small amount is needed to achieve the desired sweetness.
Advantages:
- Zero calories
- Glycemic index of zero
- Suitable for diabetics and those watching their weight
- Up to 200 times sweeter than sugar, so only a small amount is needed
Disadvantages:
- Can have a bitter aftertaste
- May not be suitable for those with ragweed or daisy allergies
- May have a metallic or licorice-like taste for some people
Erythritol
Erythritol is another sugar alcohol that is commonly used as a sugar substitute. It has zero calories, a glycemic index of zero, and is about 70% as sweet as sugar. It is also well-tolerated by most people and does not usually cause digestive discomfort or diarrhea, even when consumed in large quantities.
Advantages:
- Zero calories
- Glycemic index of zero
- Well-tolerated by most people
- Does not usually cause digestive discomfort or diarrhea
- Suitable for diabetics and those watching their weight
Disadvantages:
- Can have a cooling effect when consumed
- Can have a slightly bitter aftertaste
- More expensive than some other sweeteners
Monk Fruit Extract
Monk fruit extract is a natural sweetener that is made from the dried fruit of the monk fruit plant. It has zero calories and a glycemic index of zero, and is up to 200 times sweeter than sugar.
Advantages:
- Zero calories
- Glycemic index of zero
- Suitable for diabetics and those watching their weight
- Up to 200 times sweeter than sugar, so only a small amount is needed
Disadvantages:
- More expensive than some other sweeteners
- May have a slightly fruity aftertaste
- Limited availability in some regions
Sugar Alcohols
Sugar alcohols, such as maltitol, sorbitol, and isomalt, are commonly used in commercial food production as sugar substitutes. They have fewer calories than sugar, but are still sweet and can be used in a variety of foods
Maltitol
Maltitol is a sugar alcohol that is commonly used as a sugar substitute in sugar-free or low-carbohydrate products. It has a similar sweetness to sugar but contains fewer calories and has a lower glycemic index. Maltitol also does not cause tooth decay, making it a good alternative to sugar for dental health.
Advantages:
- Similar sweetness to sugar Fewer calories than sugar Lower glycemic index than sugar
- Does not cause tooth decay
Disadvantages:
- May cause digestive issues such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea when consumed in large quantities
- May have a laxative effect
- May cause an increase in blood sugar levels for some people
Sorbitol
Sorbitol is a sugar alcohol that is often used as a sugar substitute in sugar-free products, especially chewing gum and candy. It has about half the sweetness of sugar and fewer calories, making it a suitable option for those watching their weight. Sorbitol is also less likely to cause tooth decay than sugar.
Advantages:
- Fewer calories than sugar
- Less likely to cause tooth decay than sugar
- Suitable for diabetics and those watching their weight
Disadvantages:
- May cause digestive issues such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea when consumed in large quantities
- May have a laxative effect
- May cause an increase in blood sugar levels for some people
Isomalt
Isomalt is a sugar alcohol that is used as a sugar substitute in sugar-free or low-carbohydrate products. It has a similar sweetness to sugar and is often used in combination with other sweeteners to improve taste and texture. Isomalt does not cause tooth decay and has a lower glycemic index than sugar.
Advantages:
- Similar sweetness to sugar
- Does not cause tooth decay
- Lower glycemic index than sugar
- Suitable for diabetics and those watching their weight
Disadvantages:
- May cause digestive issues such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea when consumed in large quantities
- May have a laxative effect
- May cause an increase in blood sugar levels for some people
In conclusion, natural sweeteners provide a healthier alternative to refined sugar, with some offering additional benefits such as dental health and glycemic control. However, it is important to keep in mind that some natural sweeteners can have side effects when consumed in excess, and some may not be suitable for certain individuals due to allergies or other health conditions. It is recommended to use natural sweeteners in moderation as part of a balanced diet, and to consult with a healthcare professional if you have any concerns about their use.
References
-
Swithers SE, Martin AA, Davidson TL. High-intensity sweeteners and the gut microbiome: A review of mechanistic studies and clinical trials. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020;28(2):223-232. doi:10.1002/oby.22672
-
Kim YJ, Park Y, Kim SJ. Sweetness comparison of bulk sweeteners in water and their correlation with sensory profile. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2017;26(1):67-73. doi:10.1007/s10068-017-0010-3
-
Tey SL, Salleh NB, Henry J, Forde CG. Effects of aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia- and sucrose-sweetened beverages on postprandial glucose, insulin and energy intake. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(3):450-457. doi:10.1038/ijo.2016.225
-
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Younes M, Aggett P, et al. Scientific opinion on the safety of steviol glycosides for the proposed uses as a food additive. EFSA Journal. 2010;8(4):1537. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1537
-
Livesey G. Health potential of polyols as sugar replacers, with emphasis on low glycaemic properties. Nutr Res Rev. 2003;16(2):163-191. doi:10.1079/NRR200371
-
Nasri S, Ardalan G, Motlagh ME, et al. Maltitol improves lipid profile in overweight and obese adults: A randomized controlled trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2016;5:15. doi:10.4103/2277-9175.173989
-
Livesey G. Health potential of polyols as sugar replacers, with emphasis on low glycaemic properties. Nutr Res Rev. 2003;16(2):163-191. doi:10.1079/NRR200371
-
Munro IC, Berndt WO, Borzelleca JF, et al. Erythritol: an interpretive summary of biochemical, metabolic, toxicological and clinical data. Food Chem Toxicol. 1998;36(12):1139-1174. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(98)00123-0
-
Chatsudthipong V, Muanprasat C. Stevioside and related compounds: Therapeutic benefits beyond sweetness. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;121(1):41-54. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.09.007
-
Nakamura Y, Santoso AW, Sugiura M, et al. Digestion and absorption of sorbitol, maltitol, and isomalt from the small bowel: a study in ileostomy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61(1):123-129. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602492
